- Are you there? (please answer so we get an idea of how many people
read this regularly)
- How often would you say you check your 'tildeverse' groups?
- how many of the (tilde) groups are you following?
- If you are also a USENET reader, how often do you check your usenet
groups?
- what sort of topics would you like to read about/discuss here?
- would you find a thread of "usenet groups recommendations"
interesting?
- any idea whether we should, or how can we if so, attract more
activity/users to the news?
- do you think tilde users don't use these groups because:
- they don't know it exists
- they don't know how to access
- they know it and could participate, but don't want to
We may need experiments with hierarchies that allow a well defined
subset of HTML and maybe even images scaled down or dithered to a
reasonnable size.
Hi all,
- Are you there? (please answer so we get an idea of how many people
read this regularly)
- How often would you say you check your 'tildeverse' groups?
- how many of the (tilde) groups are you following?
- If you are also a USENET reader, how often do you check your usenet
groups?
- what sort of topics would you like to read about/discuss here?
- would you find a thread of "usenet groups recommendations"
interesting?
- any idea whether we should, or how can we if so, attract more
activity/users to the news?
- do you think tilde users don't use these groups because:
- they don't know it exists
- they don't know how to access
- they know it and could participate, but don't want to
- How often would you say you check your 'tildeverse' groups?
- how many of the (tilde) groups are you following?
- If you are also a USENET reader, how often do you check your usenet
groups?
- what sort of topics would you like to read about/discuss here?
- would you find a thread of "usenet groups recommendations"
interesting?
- any idea whether we should, or how can we if so, attract more
activity/users to the news?
- do you think tilde users don't use these groups because:
- they don't know it exists
- they don't know how to access
- they know it and could participate, but don't want to
- Are you there? (please answer so we get an idea of how many people read this
regularly)
- How often would you say you check your 'tildeverse' groups?
- how many of the (tilde) groups are you following?
- If you are also a USENET reader, how often do you check your usenet
groups?
- what sort of topics would you like to read about/discuss here?
- would you find a thread of "usenet groups recommendations"
interesting?
- any idea whether we should, or how can we if so, attract more
activity/users to the news?
Hi all,
- Are you there? (please answer so we get an idea of how many people
read this regularly)
- How often would you say you check your 'tildeverse' groups?
- how many of the (tilde) groups are you following?
- If you are also a USENET reader, how often do you check your usenet
groups?
- what sort of topics would you like to read about/discuss here?
- would you find a thread of "usenet groups recommendations"
interesting?
- any idea whether we should, or how can we if so, attract more
activity/users to the news?
- do you think tilde users don't use these groups because:
- they don't know it exists - they don't know how to access - they
know it and could participate, but don't want to
I think the answer, as in many other things, is complicated. Some
don't know they're here. Some prefer to use bbj locally, or the email
list. Others just want to stick to IRC for tilde interactions.
I think most people will be swayed, one way or another, by just where the activity is located. If bbj was where all conversations happened, I would follow that more. If it's all in NNTP, I'll prioritize that. But we've got
a little bit of activity in a lot of places.
lafe <lafe@tilde.club> wrote:
I think most people will be swayed, one way or another, by just where
the activity is located. If bbj was where all conversations happened,
I would follow that more. If it's all in NNTP, I'll prioritize
that. But we've got a little bit of activity in a lot of places.
As a start the Tildeverse's mailing lists should be bridged into NNTP
and it should not stop there.
Hi all,Hi, there
Are you there? (please answer so we get an ideaI am definitely here.
of how many people read this regularly)
How often would you say you check your'tildeverse' groups?
how many of the (tilde) groups are you following?I follow
If you are also a USENET reader, how often do youDaily. And are there people who do not use a
check your usenet groups?
what sort of topics would you like to read about/discuss here?I think HN put it more elegantly:
would you find a thread of "usenet groups recommendations"No.
interesting?
any idea whether we should, or how can we if so, attract moreNothing. Low traffic is better.
activity/users to the news?
do you think tilde users don't use these groups because:[ ] they don't know it exists
how many of the (tilde) groups are you following?I follow
comp.{text.tex,lang.{c,awk,python},unix.{shell,misc}} and tilde.{art.ascii,club,green,institute,meta,python,services,team,text}.
About 15 if I am counting correctly.
If you are also a USENET reader, how often do youDaily. And are there people who do not use a
check your usenet groups?
USENET reader? I thought the web interface died
when Google Groups disconnected from USENET. And
thanks to that one step, the spam problem has
substantially been reduced.
Maybe I'm getting the names of things wrong: I was refering on one sidehow many of the (tilde) groups are you following?I follow
comp.{text.tex,lang.{c,awk,python},unix.{shell,misc}} and tilde.{art.ascii,club,green,institute,meta,python,services,team,text}
.
About 15 if I am counting correctly.
If you are also a USENET reader, how often do youDaily. And are there people who do not use a
check your usenet groups?
USENET reader? I thought the web interface died
when Google Groups disconnected from USENET. And
thanks to that one step, the spam problem has
substantially been reduced.
Sysop: | deepend |
---|---|
Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
Users: | 270 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 54:05:31 |
Calls: | 2,206 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 4,658 |
D/L today: |
158 files (38,091K bytes) |
Messages: | 423,198 |
Posted today: | 1 |